What You’re Up Against, Without The Universal Individual Rights Project.

Does the article below even include things like all the regulations ( yes, “laws” ) issued by federal agencies like EPA?

The bottom line, people: Without adopting The Universal Individual Rights Project ( which contains a Sunset clause for laws! Laws not renewed would drop like flies! ), there’s absolutely no hope of ever even reading all of these laws, yet alone eliminating all of the bad ones – the ones that suck away your income and liberty – and “draining the swamp”.

“If anyone were to take the time to read the Federal Register of Laws, in which all laws passed by Congress are recorded since its first session in 1789, and they read an average of 700 pages per week, it would take them over 25,000 years to read them all. This number becomes even more daunting every two years, since Congress passes an average of 2,000 bills during each session. In light of this impossible task, the old adage “ignorance of the law is no excuse” is completely unreasonable. As a matter of fact, this quantity of laws makes unwitting lawbreakers out of every person living in America. Consequently, to claim all these laws are necessary is either a gross exaggeration or an outright lie, because in many cases Congress has exceeded their constitutional authority in passing them.”


https://americanfoundingprinciples.com/are-all-laws-necessary/#more-163

The Real Danger of “Sanctuary Cities”

This controversy has been swirling around for quite awhile now, but I’m not sure that most people fully understand the true dangers of it.

A “Sanctuary City” is essentially when the electorate of a city decide to unlawfully declare it immune from certain federal laws of the United States.

Think about that for a minute. The city still receives all the entitlement benefits of being within the United States, but declares itself immune from selected laws of the United States.

That means that they can still get welfare funding from the U.S. government, and they can even declare that their immunity allows illegal aliens to come there from anywhere in the world, and be allowed to vote in their elections – even in federal elections, in which the illegals can vote for more entitlements like welfare benefits.

It sets a very dangerous precedent, if allowed to continue. Should anyone in the world who sets foot illegally in the United States, be immune from being picked up and deported, be allowed to vote in our elections, receive welfare, and even walk into an emergency room and demand medical care, but not have the money or insurance to pay for it? It’s a recipe for destruction, and I think that the radicals in the Democratic Party know that, and approve, because it fits their agenda, of ending the United States.

Keep in mind, that the city doing this is still entitled to federal funding for a myriad of things, and to be defended by the U.S. military, but they have essentially declared themselves to be immune from U.S. laws, in several ways, and may even expand that list in the future.

And what next? Imagine the next step, where such cities might declare themselves to be independent empire states, from U.S. laws, yet still entitled to all of the benefits of collecting money from the United States, to support their unlawful empires. Where will that end up?


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sanders-plan-to-ship-illegal-immigrants-to-sanctuary-cities-under-thorough-review

The New Zealand Mosque Massacres

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

New Zealand has tougher gun laws than the United States, but someone committed mass murder this past day, so they think that they need even more right to keep and bear arms infringement laws now.

There was just a video of one of their officials responding in the media, reassuring people that, “We will protect you”.

Oh? Did you protect them during these massacres? So doesn’t that prove that the government can’t possibly protect all of us, all the time? ( Maybe they can hope to protect high government officials. )

No, unlike Senators and other government high officials, those of us who don’t get 24/7/365 government protection must defend ourselves, and, you know what? It’s a universal HUMAN ( individual ) RIGHT to do so! Whether particular governments recognize that right, or not. When they won’t recognize our human rights, it’s known as tyranny.

The whole premise of the Universal Individual Rights Project is that individual rights don’t just belong to Americans – they are universal and belong to ALL people.

It’s our position that no free adult should be denied the Human Right to Keep And Bear Arms for their defense, and for the defense of their loved ones, and countries. When people are denied these human rights, they very often fall victims to various forms of tyranny. ( The Holocaust, Stalin’s starving to death of 17 million Ukrainians, Mao’s killing of 70 million Chinese – just to name a few. 2 million in North Korea. The horrible situation now, in Venezuela, where they may soon be reduced to cannibalism. ) And we’ve heard it said that; “When they tell you to get into the cattle cars, it’s too late”.

So it’s our position that ALL gun laws ( INCLUDING REQUIRING A GOVERNMENT LICENSE – PERMISSION for CONCEALED CARRY! ) should be repealed immediately, as they violate human rights.

This Project firmly states that:
“The right of Free Adult Individuals to keep and bear arms Shall Not Be Infringed.”

We at The Universal Individual Rights Project condemn, in the strongest terms, those who commit evil acts in this world, and those acts, but we are against collective blame and collective guilt ( We do not, and will not, accept blame and guilt for what others do, as that is often the excuse for imposing tyranny! ), and punishing the 99.994% of good people for what an extremely tiny minority does, with the infringement of their HUMAN RIGHTS.

So in this instance, we also condemn those who are blaming President Trump for what someone else did. There are always bad people who support any and all given political leaders. Every single one of them. How dare these opposition people blame President Trump, because he recognizes an illegal invasion of our country and wants to stop it and defend our borders, like the Constitution demands that he should?

So we now call upon the foaming-at-the-mouth authoritarians, all over the world, to STOP DANCING IN THE BLOOD OF THE VICTIMS of every evil act like this, and calling for our HUMAN RIGHTS to be further abolished.
– Kira Saoirse, author of “The Universal Individual Rights Project”. ( Read the book on Amazon. )

Movie: Captain Marvel

We went to the theater and saw Captain Marvel today.

Now being, as the author of The Universal Individual Rights Project, I have a vast network of information sources, and people I know, I happen to have gotten to the bottom of something that has been puzzling many of us, for some time now. Many new movies have been getting tarnishing reviews, before they even come out, when almost no one has been able to see them. It’s been very odd. Well now I know why.

We’ve been involved in what I refer to as a “Civil Cold War”, here in the U.S., essentially between pro-liberty, pro-Constitution factions who like and admire most things about our nation, and Democrat “Progressive” ( Socialist ) / “Liberal”-Fascists / Communists, who would be more inclined to eliminate the United States and globalize everything. ( You think you have problems now! )

So these two bickering factions have been locking up the functionality of our government, and generally messing things up, for years now. And I found out recently, that their fighting has bled over into movie reviews in recent years, too.

So a close friend was telling me, the other day, that Captain Marvel has been getting a lot of bad reviews, before it even came out. Why? They’re saying that it’s because Brie Larson, the woman who plays Captain Marvel, is an SJW ( Social Justice Warrior ) in real life. For those not yet familiar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior says “Social justice warrior (SJW) is a pejorative term for an individual who promotes socially progressive ( In my view – a term for “Progressive Socialist” – look up London School of Economics, Shaw, etc. ) views, including feminismcivil rights, and multiculturalism,[1][2] as well as identity politics.[3]

Now, as a philosophical Objectivist ( the philosophy of Ayn Rand ), I think that everyone should have equal rights under the law, and I am so, so against racism. ( Rand had a whole page full to say about that – one of the best arguments I’ve ever read, and I agree 100% ). But many people refer to SJW as “Social(ist) “Justice” Warrior” too, and much of the reasoning behind that comes from the parts of SJW that see humans as a blight on mother earth, to be eliminated, think that white people should be paying “reparations” to black folks, for slavery, which happened 200 years ago, of that “people of color” are “victims” of white people in this world. Oh, and that white people should feel “white guilt”. Then there’s the Socialist redistribution of wealth aspect, blaming anyone who has money, for the plight of those who don’t, and suggesting looting those with money, and redistributing it to those who don’t.

I have problems with those things. First, I’m totally against what I call collective blame and collective guilt. Take, for example, slavery 200 years ago. My family arrived here around 1900, so they certainly weren’t responsible for it, and I’m certainly not, being I was born way after that. But SJW’s often demand that those who weren’t responsible for slavery, pay back those who weren’t around during slavery, and that’s just irrational and wrong, in so many ways.

And as for “people of color” being “victims” in this world, it’s been my observation that wearing the cloak of victimhood can totally destroy one’s life, and actually be a way of someone keeping themselves down. If people make a point of becoming literate and emotionally functional, and subscribe to a good philosophy ( I recommend Objectivism, because it’s the only philosophy that I’ve ever found, that I can agree with 100%, and I think it’s the best, for liberty, peace and prosperity. ), well I think there are very few limits on what they can do, or become in this world – mostly self limitations.

And I’m totally for the right to own private property, including what we spend our lives to produce – our money. I don’t want someone saying that they should seize mine, at gunpoint, and give it away to someone else.

Yes, there are actually parts of the world where slavery and oppression still exist, and we should denounce and renounce it, wherever it does, and try to help free people from it ( the very purpose of The Universal Individual Rights Project. ), but that’s an ongoing effort.

But here’s what I see as the crux of the matter, with this movie, and I think it transcends the movie itself: We in the United States have been purposely divided, for the purpose of conquering us. Our “rulers” ( and yes, I think we’re to the point of being ruled now – it’s become that bad ) love nothing less than having us at each others’ throats all the time, bickering and fighting. And I don’t think that the important issues can be solved by compromising, because fundamental liberty should not, and cannot be subject to compromise, or it gets compromised away.

So my first point, in all of this, is the movie itself. If we decide to boycott any, and every movie that has someone whom we don’t like the politics of, well we will likely never be able to watch many movies or TV shows. Given that, we went to see the movie or ourselves, and we agree that the IMDb average of viewer ratings – a 7 on a scale of 1-10, was pretty accurate. It was a decent movie if you like sci- fi and the Marvel Universe genre – despite its political and philosophical biases.

But it had transcendent value to me, because it stimulated my thought about the above issues and the megapolitical realities involved.

I agree with what many Objectivists have been saying for years, that we absolutely must understand Objectivist philosophy, and reason, and that bickering and fighting won’t win this battle – only offering a better philosophy, and reason will. After reading most of Ayn Rand’s books, and learning a bit about logical fallacies in debating others, I think that I know how to use reason against such fallacies, and the kinds of philosophies that keep most people in this world poor and enslaved. Yes, philosophy is everything.

So when I do discuss issues with someone on the left, I can win with reason, and if that causes them to be like “playing chess with a pigeon”, and they kick over the chess board and poop on it, and walk away feeling proud, well so be it, because I’ve won the reasoned argument.

So I want to reinforce and put forth to you, that only by learning this philosophy, which has been described as “the philosophy for living life on earth”, and spreading knowledge of it in the world ( something that many of us are working on ), we will actually be able to save the world from sinking into tyranny, and loss of true human rights, from which humanity may never be able to recover.

So get out and relax a little, if you can, and read up on Objectivism, and of course The Universal Individual Rights Project, which is based on it, and quit lowering yourselves with these purposeful distractions of bickering, while the enemies of liberty keep working against us behind the scenes. Philosophy is your greatest weapon against tyranny, but you must realize that, and learn to “use the Force” that it will give you. – Kira Saoirse, author of “The Universal Individual Rights Project”. ( Read the book on Amazon. )

And if you do go to see this movie, it has a couple of extra scenes – one after the main movie, and a funny one after the credits, which most people in the theater missed, because they left and didn’t wait for it.

“3 Reasons Millennials Should Ditch Karl Marx for Ayn Rand” – I Love This Linked Article!

Socialism punishes success, and rewards failure. You can see the evidence in everything they propose and do! Every agenda. At least until they actually do take power, and then you either work or die.

When you work hard, do you want to be looted by the government, to support “people who want a minimum income even though they don’t want to work”? We at The Universal Individual Rights Project refer to that as “Give us your paychecks and we’ll spend and waste most of it and give you back what we think you need.” It’s what happens under Socialism and Communism. The state essentially owns you, and everything you produce. Witness nations like Greece, Italy, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, and China. It replaces religion, with state worship. Why do you think the Chinese have been so brutal with religious people?

Ayn Rand was a child under the horrific conditions of Soviet Russia. I couldn’t even read her first novel, “We The Living”, because the first several pages were too depressing. After her family escaped to the United States, and she grew to adulthood here, she gradually developed the philosophy of Objectivism. It’s the opposite of Socialism, but NOT the crony corporatism, and forced-collectivism that we have in the U.S. today. Pure philosophical Capitalism, at the best it can be! It rewards success by recognizing that we have the human right ( Yes, by the true definition! ) to own property, and the fruits of what we spend our time to produce. “The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” was originally stated as “the right to life, liberty, and property”. It doesn’t “punish failure” – it just doesn’t reward people who want to loot others. ( Have you ever wondered why the Socialist leaning cultures think the Vikings were so cool? ) So the linked article below is right on the money, and it also appeals to the left, including classical liberals, in some great ways! And The Universal Individual Rights Project has the blueprint for a sea change in political systems, to give us a world of prosperity and freedom, the likes of which has never been seen yet by humanity! – Kira Saoirse, author of “The Universal Individual Rights Project”. ( Read the book on Amazon. )

https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwe.tl%2ft-tiheBTU81R&c=E,1,E
tzLCYHXBGO-g9m3zoRLqej7iPKvydKXOZPt7DPlXLzVJftXqJ15WaZKK6a25HOlxT95htC6zES3wayg0
esj7_Z23LIcX2t9uGE2PVQDcwmMeeCbsRqRng,,&typo=1

was originally stated as It doesn’t “punish failure” – it just doesn’t reward people who want to loot others. So the linked article below is right on the money, and it also appeals to the left, including classical liberals, in some great ways! And The Universal Individual Rights Project has the blueprint for a sea change in political systems, to give us a world of prosperity and freedom, the likes of which has never been seen yet by humanity! – Kira Saoirse, author of “The Universal Individual Rights Project”. ( Read the book on Amazon. )

3 Reasons Millennials Should Ditch Karl Marx for Ayn Rand

Now Here Comes The Grandiose Socialist Fantasy – “Health Care For All”

Aside from the estimates that the “Green New Deal would cost $93 TRILLION, here we have the Socialists’ “Healthcare for All” fantasy, which would cost a “mere” $32 TRILLION. ( All of this, to come from looting “the rich”, we presume. Like a million ticks, sucking blood from a dog – except the dog doesn’t have that much blood.

“Representative Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act would replace nearly all current insurance with a government-run single-payer plan and extend that plan to those who currently lack health coverage. The plan itself would be far more generous than either Medicare or most private coverage, as it would include no deductibles or copayments, would not restrict beneficiaries to networks of care, and would offer a broad suite of benefits including dental care, vision care, transportation for disabled and low-income patients, certain dietary and nutritional care, long-term care, and other long-term services and support. The proposal also establishes a global health budget, moves away from fee-for-service and toward lump-sum payments for many providers, includes a number of measures to hold down drug prices, and makes a variety of other changes to the health care system.”

So it would be so amazing, as to also establish a “global health budget” too? At the expense of U.S. tax slaves?

But sadly, as always, these schemes rapidly disintegrate, when we ask the simple question; Who pays for them?

The massive amount of government growth under the Obama administration ( Oh, I forgot – we’re supposed to call it “creating jobs”. ) has already left the average American with less than $200 a month in disposable income, while those who work for the government make far more money than the average worker among us.

How Much Will Medicare for All Cost?

Hollywood and the Music Industry, From The Perspective Of The Rest Of Us

From the Facebook group with the above name, published here with permission of the moderator: Are you fed up with the “Liberal”/Democrat/Socialist/Communist propaganda machine that Hollywood has become? Perhaps the rest of us can use this group to finally make our voices heard! Hollywood: Are your profits suffering? We can explain WHY!

We’ve been discussing Marvel’s new Captain America movie, and why Rotten Tomatoes just stopped accepting reviews, before movies are released, because it was messing up the movies, when no one had even seen them yet. We’ve had a couple of movies that we didn’t see because of that, and were perplexed at all the reviews, before anyone had even see the movies, which hadn’t been released yet. But because of a discussion here, I think we got to the bottom of why, and what can be done by Hollywood!

Some members here, expressed that they were panning ( giving bad reviews to the new movie ) Captain Marvel. I asked why, and noted that the movie hadn’t even been released yet. Some mentioned it being a protest against SJW – Social(ist) “Justice” Warriors.

Again, I asked them; Have you seen the movie? It hasn’t even been released yet.

They clarified, that no – the actress playing the lead role is a SJW. Ohhhh! Now this is a very valid point.

#Hollywood needs to understand that when they make movies that are extremely biased in favor of Democrat “Progressive” ( Socialist ) / “Liberal”-Fascism / Communism, or that EVEN have famous actors in them, that are those types of people, they risk angering about half the American population, who then won’t want to see the movies, and MAY even give them bad reviews JUST because of that!

I, myself, relate perfectly to that, as I will not watch movies with the likes of Barbara Streisand, Whooppee Goldberg, Robert De Niro, Georgie Clooney, or Rosie O’Donnel in them! I think that they have contributed to the destruction of this country, and have so divided us, that I simply won’t watch or listen to anything they do, anymore. And this includes similar politicians.

So I questioned, why Hollywood would produce such biased movies and TV, which would risk angering half the American population, and those of us who feel angered, would not watch what they produced, and could even give it bad reviews – JUST because of their extreme bias and anti-American political agenda.

I think I know the answer. Because they SIMPLY don’t CARE. But WHY would they not care? Two reasons:
1.) They’re so filled with seething hatred against America, that they want to keep producing biased propaganda media, to destroy us.
2.) They MAY be calculating that there are billions of people out there in the rest of the world, who are so sold down the river of Democrat “Progressive” ( Socialist ) / “Liberal”-Fascist / Communism that they will LIKE what they produce, so half the American population won’t matter in the long run.

They already OWN and CONTROL about 90% of the media. It’s been my lifelong observation that, when Communists would take over a country, the very first thing they would capture, would be the TV and radio stations.

Well this has been done in the United States, by indoctrination of generations of school children. So literally billions of people all over the world, now believe what’s told to them by this biased, pro-Socialist media. Spoon fed.

“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” — Ayn Rand.

So the rest of us must now decide how we wish to oppose this impending tyranny, and it’s perfectly valid to express one’s opinions of this extremely evil political ideology, which could soon destroy the world and enslave us all.

From Hollywood and the Music Industry, From The Perspective Of The Rest Of Us!

Despite What They Propagandize, Healthcare Is Not, And Cannot Be, A Legitimate “Right”

“Dictionary result for propaganda prop·a·gan·da

/ˌpräpəˈɡandə/nounnoun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda

1.information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.”

“By means of shrewd lies, unremittingly repeated, it is possible to make people believe that heaven is hell – and hell heaven. The greater the lie, the more readily it will be believed.” – Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth.” – Vladimir Lenin.

“Healthcare is a human right!” – Propaganda chorus repeated by the  Democrat “Progressive” ( Socialist ) / “Liberal”-Fascists / Communists, as an attempt to redefine the meaning of the term “human right”, to conform with Socialism!

WRONG!

This is a false, twisted, unreal, unsustainable and impossible redefinition of what a human right is!

Words must have objective meanings!

“huÆman rightsÆ, fundamental rights, esp. those believed to belong to an individual and in whose exercise a government may not interfere, as the rights to speak*, associate, work, etc. [1785-95] “·

Dictionary.com Unabridged · Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2011.

“A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context. There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or corollaries): a man’s right to his own life. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action; the right to life means the right to engage in self-sustaining and self-generated action-which means: the freedom to take all the actions required by the nature of a rational being for the support, the furtherance, the fulfillment and the enjoyment of his own life. (Such is the meaning of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.)

The concept of a “right” pertains only to action – specifically, to freedom of action. It means freedom from physical compulsion, coercion or interference by other men.

Thus, for every individual, a right is the moral sanction of a positive-of his freedom to act on his own judgment, for his own goals, by his own voluntary, uncoerced choice. As to his neighbors, his rights impose no obligations on them except of a negative kind: to abstain from violating his rights.

The right to life is the source of all rights-and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.

Bear in mind that the right to property is a right to action, like all the others: it is not the right to an object, but to the action and the consequences of producing or earning that object. It is not a guarantee that a man will earn any property, but only a guarantee that he will own it if he earns it. It is the right to gain, to keep, to use and to dispose of material values.” – Ayn Rand.

“Any alleged “right” of one man, which necessitates the violation of the rights of another, is not and cannot be a right. No man can have a right to impose an unchosen obligation, an unrewarded duty or an involuntary servitude on another man. There can be no such thing as “the right to enslave”. — Ayn Rand.

Judge Andrew Napolitano has agreed, numerous times, that “Healthcare is a Good – NOT a “Right”.

“Men who deny individual rights cannot claim, defend or uphold any rights whatsoever. … The liberals are guilty of the same contradiction, but in a different form. They advocate the sacrifice of all individual rights to unlimited majority rule – yet posture as defenders of the rights of minorities. But the smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.” – Ayn Rand.

If you let would-be Socialist dictators change the meaning of true rights, no one will have any. – Kira Saoirse, in Colorado – author of “The Universal Individual Rights Project”. ( Read the book on Amazon. )

House Democrats Unveil Plan to Bring Total Government Control Over American Health Care

Military Conscription ( the “Draft” ) Is Involuntary Servitude and Slavery

It is the position of The Universal Individual Rights Project that military conscription – also known in the U.S. as “the Draft” – amounts to involuntary servitude and therefore slavery, which is still a violation of the 13th Amendment in the United States, and illegal in other civilized nations.

Except for the 16th Amendment – establishing the income tax, which we think is a violation of the 13th Amendment and should be repealed ( it was misrepresented to the American people, as just a tiny tax that wouldn’t lead to the unlimited out of control growth of the federal government ), military conscription is a clear case of involuntary servitude and slavery having existed in the United States in modern times.

How is it any different than the practice of
Shanghaiing , of which Wikipedia says: “Shanghaiing or crimping is the practice of kidnapping people to serve as sailors by coercive techniques such as trickery, intimidation, or violence.”?

It is to the credit of the United States, that we eventually switched to a voluntary system of military enlistment, but some Americans still think that we should keep the Draft available, and force people to register and carry “draft cards” for the event that the United States is directly attacked, or has a dire national emergency and needs to conscript people, who wouldn’t otherwise volunteer for service.

But it is the position of The Universal Individual Rights Project, that, “Any nation that can’t be defended by volunteers, isn’t worth defending.” Please think about that, we think it’s a profound principle.

And in modern times, with the media being available the way it is, we also think that any legitimate government should be able to make their case to convince the people, that voluntary service is important to the safety of their families and their nation, or even so that their nation may continue to exist. In a free nation, there should be plenty of volunteers to defend it, as long as the cause is also legitimate, and not just to support the whims of politicians and their cronies, for money and power, by perpetuating unjust wars all over the world.

We at The Universal Individual Rights Project respect and love our military, which we think is the best military that the world has ever seen, but we also think that it is, in great part, because it is a voluntary military, that this is so. If we were in battle, would we want someone covering our backs, who was forced into service against their will, and might desert at any time? We think not.

The Male-Only Draft May Be Unconstitutional, but Conscription Itself Is Unjust